The reactive reporting system is widely used to introduce HSE performances and to notify the
robustness of management aspects in place. However, lagging indicators are not sufficient to measure
employees’ perception and to demonstrate organisational efforts or leadership commitment to HSE
requirement.
Being proactive throughout leading indicators is the most appropriate way to perform reporting process and
to assess HSE performance measurement. Hence, proactive reporting system contributes effectively to
explain the attitudes and to establish essential attempts to improve the whole HSE features.
This paper examines both the existing Tr@cker findings and the HSE performance measurement linked to In
Amenas Operations with a further benchmarking assessment of leading and lagging indicators.
In addition, a survey has been carried out to gauge both HSE culture on site and familiarity of employees
with the elements of proactive reporting system in place. And while the human factors take an immense part
when conducting the reporting process, a human reliability analysis was pursued to evaluate such
contribution.
The findings show that the management targets are not achieved as a whole; for this reason more effort must
be focussed within the reporting practices, regarding procedures, defining responsibilities and allocating
crucial resources with no blame culture and contractors’ involvement.
The current study serves as a baseline reference to evaluate forthcoming progress effort and to weigh against
prospect improvement areas.
-
Votre commentaire
Votre commentaire s'affichera sur cette page après validation par l'administrateur.
Ceci n'est en aucun cas un formulaire à l'adresse du sujet évoqué,
mais juste un espace d'opinion et d'échange d'idées dans le respect.
Posté Le : 30/08/2022
Posté par : einstein
Ecrit par : - Bouacha Farid
Source : Revue de l'Algerian Petroleum Institute Volume 2, Numéro 2, Pages 17-24 2008-07-15