The question of tolerance in religious, intellectual, and even political discourse has become a fundamental and urgent demand in contemporary discourse And the clash of ideas and the misery of civilizations is caused by the clash caused by violence extremism and intolerance which led Arab and Islamic societies to reconsider religious discourse. The aim of this speech is to hold accountable the act of amnesty, reconciliation and tolerance to the extent possible responding to the creation of cultural bridges of communication?
We wondered whether tolerance (amnesty and reconciliation) could be an option for civilized communication.
And to what extent religious discourse and political discourse are consistent in employing the act of tolerance to eliminate the clash Intolerance?
In the end, what are the justifications and futures of the act of tolerance?
-
تعليقكـم
سيظهر تعليقك على هذه الصفحة بعد موافقة المشرف.
هذا النمودج ليس مخصص لبعث رسالة شخصية لأين كان بل فضاء للنقاش و تبادل الآراء في إحترام
تاريخ الإضافة : 14/08/2022
مضاف من طرف : einstein
صاحب المقال : - فريدة أولمو
المصدر : مجلة مشكلات الحضارة Volume 4, Numéro 1, Pages 8-23 2016-06-30